News

Nicki Minaj Wins Over Tracy Chapman’s Copyright Dispute

This case on Nicki Minaj committing copyright infringement has been going around for a long while now. Finally, the judge has made up their mind and the judge is in favor of Nicki Minaj. This makes Nicki Minaj won the highly anticipated case and she is proven not guilty of committing copyright infringement when she created a song based on Tracy Chapman’s “Baby Can I Hold You” in her unreleased song “Sorry” that was supposed to be in Queen album.

The ruling protects the industry practice of developing a new song based on existing material and then seeking a license from the original artist prior to release. U.S. district judge Virginia A. Phillips ruled that Minaj’s experimentation with Chapman’s song constitutes “fair use” and is not copyright infringement.

The rules that are implemented right now protects the practice’s industry to develop a new song that is based on any existing material that has been created before. They are permitted to seek a license from the original artist before the release of the song. The United States district judge Virginia A. Phillips has finally ruled that Nicki Minaj’s attempt to experiment with Tracy Chapman’s song constitutes a “fair use” and it’s never a copyright infringement.

The particular judge stated that “Artists usually experiment with works before seeking licenses from rights holders and rights holders typically ask to see a proposed work before approving a license”. The judge also added, “A ruling uprooting these common practices would limit creativity and stifle innovation within the music industry.”

Nicki Minaj’s attorneys mentioned that “Such free-flowing creativity is important to all recording artists, but particularly in hip hop”, the attorney also added, “With that category of music, a recording artist typically goes into the studio and experiments with dozens of different ‘beats’ or snippets of melodies, before hitting upon a pleasing combination.”

The argument that they come out stated that artists need to be free so that they are able to create something that has an impact on the song even though it is based on existing material. They should not have to worry about any circumstances that they could be sued for such experimentation once they approach the rights-holder for a license.

Sources: Variety.

Adib Mohd

Recent Posts

UNIQLO Malaysia Strengthens Long-Term Commitment to Environment Conservation

Global apparel retailer UNIQLO today announced that it will continue its partnerships with Taman Tugu… Read More

5 hours ago

Casio to Release G-SHOCK Commemorating International Women’s Day

Casio Computer Co., Ltd. announced today the release of the latest addition to the G-SHOCK… Read More

7 hours ago

New Balance Expands Running Portfolio with the Launch of the Ellipse

New Balance is excited to unveil the Ellipse, the brand's newest evolution in running. Runners… Read More

7 hours ago

The Legendary Mate is Back: HUAWEI Mate 80 Pro Set to Arrive in Malaysia Soon

HUAWEI recently hosted its “Now Is Your Run” global product launch event in Madrid, marking… Read More

8 hours ago

Emma Raducanu Joins UNIQLO as Global Brand Ambassador

UNIQLO, the Japanese global apparel retailer, announces a unique new partnership with Emma Raducanu. The… Read More

1 day ago

One Night Only, 6 Planets Gather in the Sky This February 28

Mark your calendars, February 28 will feature a rare celestial astronomical event, where six planets… Read More

1 day ago

This website uses cookies.