News

Nicki Minaj Wins Over Tracy Chapman’s Copyright Dispute

This case on Nicki Minaj committing copyright infringement has been going around for a long while now. Finally, the judge has made up their mind and the judge is in favor of Nicki Minaj. This makes Nicki Minaj won the highly anticipated case and she is proven not guilty of committing copyright infringement when she created a song based on Tracy Chapman’s “Baby Can I Hold You” in her unreleased song “Sorry” that was supposed to be in Queen album.

The ruling protects the industry practice of developing a new song based on existing material and then seeking a license from the original artist prior to release. U.S. district judge Virginia A. Phillips ruled that Minaj’s experimentation with Chapman’s song constitutes “fair use” and is not copyright infringement.

The rules that are implemented right now protects the practice’s industry to develop a new song that is based on any existing material that has been created before. They are permitted to seek a license from the original artist before the release of the song. The United States district judge Virginia A. Phillips has finally ruled that Nicki Minaj’s attempt to experiment with Tracy Chapman’s song constitutes a “fair use” and it’s never a copyright infringement.

The particular judge stated that “Artists usually experiment with works before seeking licenses from rights holders and rights holders typically ask to see a proposed work before approving a license”. The judge also added, “A ruling uprooting these common practices would limit creativity and stifle innovation within the music industry.”

Nicki Minaj’s attorneys mentioned that “Such free-flowing creativity is important to all recording artists, but particularly in hip hop”, the attorney also added, “With that category of music, a recording artist typically goes into the studio and experiments with dozens of different ‘beats’ or snippets of melodies, before hitting upon a pleasing combination.”

The argument that they come out stated that artists need to be free so that they are able to create something that has an impact on the song even though it is based on existing material. They should not have to worry about any circumstances that they could be sued for such experimentation once they approach the rights-holder for a license.

Sources: Variety.

Adib Mohd

Recent Posts

Ready for Peril, Built for Protection: iCAUR V23 Secures 5-Star ASEAN NCAP Rating, the Ultimate All-Rounder Combat EV

iCAUR Malaysia today announced that the iCAUR V23 has achieved a full 5-Star rating under… Read More

1 day ago

LG Sound Suite: The World’s First Soundbar Audio System Powered by Dolby Atmos FlexConnect

At CES 2026, LG Electronics (LG) is transforming home entertainment with LG Sound Suite by… Read More

1 day ago

The Sea Is Calling? Relive Your Nostalgia with These 4 Iconic Moments from Duyung (2008)

Even after all these years, Duyung remains one of those local films that continues to… Read More

3 days ago

Naughty or Nice? A Chapter of Laughter and Chaos Begins This Christmas at IKEA

Choosing Christmas presents can be A LOT. Especially when you’re shopping for people who range… Read More

3 days ago

Horizon Watches Presents: SPECTRUM A Return to Symmetry. A Step Forward in Design

As much of the watch industry continues to flirt with asymmetry and visual excess, Horizon… Read More

3 days ago

More Than Just “Lah”, How a Tiny Word Says Everything About Malaysian Workplace Culture

In the Malaysian workplace culture, the word "lah" appears everywhere. "Can lah", "Don't worry lah",… Read More

3 days ago

This website uses cookies.