News

Nicki Minaj Wins Over Tracy Chapman’s Copyright Dispute

This case on Nicki Minaj committing copyright infringement has been going around for a long while now. Finally, the judge has made up their mind and the judge is in favor of Nicki Minaj. This makes Nicki Minaj won the highly anticipated case and she is proven not guilty of committing copyright infringement when she created a song based on Tracy Chapman’s “Baby Can I Hold You” in her unreleased song “Sorry” that was supposed to be in Queen album.

The ruling protects the industry practice of developing a new song based on existing material and then seeking a license from the original artist prior to release. U.S. district judge Virginia A. Phillips ruled that Minaj’s experimentation with Chapman’s song constitutes “fair use” and is not copyright infringement.

The rules that are implemented right now protects the practice’s industry to develop a new song that is based on any existing material that has been created before. They are permitted to seek a license from the original artist before the release of the song. The United States district judge Virginia A. Phillips has finally ruled that Nicki Minaj’s attempt to experiment with Tracy Chapman’s song constitutes a “fair use” and it’s never a copyright infringement.

The particular judge stated that “Artists usually experiment with works before seeking licenses from rights holders and rights holders typically ask to see a proposed work before approving a license”. The judge also added, “A ruling uprooting these common practices would limit creativity and stifle innovation within the music industry.”

Nicki Minaj’s attorneys mentioned that “Such free-flowing creativity is important to all recording artists, but particularly in hip hop”, the attorney also added, “With that category of music, a recording artist typically goes into the studio and experiments with dozens of different ‘beats’ or snippets of melodies, before hitting upon a pleasing combination.”

The argument that they come out stated that artists need to be free so that they are able to create something that has an impact on the song even though it is based on existing material. They should not have to worry about any circumstances that they could be sued for such experimentation once they approach the rights-holder for a license.

Sources: Variety.

Adib Mohd

Recent Posts

RIMOWA Brings New Seasonal Hues Across Essential And Groove Collections

RIMOWA introduces two new seasonal hues, Umber and Ultramarine, to its Essential and Groove collections.… Read More

23 minutes ago

KLSCM 2026 Draws 40,000 Runners as ASICS Brings More to Race Weekend

For thousands of runners, the Kuala Lumpur Standard Chartered Marathon (KLSCM) is more than just… Read More

18 hours ago

Taylor’s Brings Movement, Wellness and Co-Branded Style to Campus

Taylor’s Lakeside Campus came alive with movement and energy as students, staff and alumni gathered… Read More

18 hours ago

PDRM Investigates Alleged Assault Involving AKPS Director-General At KLIA

The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) has confirmed that it received police reports from two PDRM… Read More

21 hours ago

Dr Suraya Hani Makes History as First Malaysian Woman With PhD in Electrophysiology Alternative Headlines

Malaysian cardiologist Dr Suraya Hani Kamsani has made history after becoming the first Malaysian woman… Read More

1 day ago

Suria KLCC Car Park Joins Touch ’n Go Group’s LPR Parking Network, Bringing Automatic Payments to Visitors

Suria KLCC Car Park is the latest addition to Touch ‘n Go Group’s Licence Plate… Read More

1 day ago

This website uses cookies.