News

Nicki Minaj Wins Over Tracy Chapman’s Copyright Dispute

This case on Nicki Minaj committing copyright infringement has been going around for a long while now. Finally, the judge has made up their mind and the judge is in favor of Nicki Minaj. This makes Nicki Minaj won the highly anticipated case and she is proven not guilty of committing copyright infringement when she created a song based on Tracy Chapman’s “Baby Can I Hold You” in her unreleased song “Sorry” that was supposed to be in Queen album.

The ruling protects the industry practice of developing a new song based on existing material and then seeking a license from the original artist prior to release. U.S. district judge Virginia A. Phillips ruled that Minaj’s experimentation with Chapman’s song constitutes “fair use” and is not copyright infringement.

The rules that are implemented right now protects the practice’s industry to develop a new song that is based on any existing material that has been created before. They are permitted to seek a license from the original artist before the release of the song. The United States district judge Virginia A. Phillips has finally ruled that Nicki Minaj’s attempt to experiment with Tracy Chapman’s song constitutes a “fair use” and it’s never a copyright infringement.

The particular judge stated that “Artists usually experiment with works before seeking licenses from rights holders and rights holders typically ask to see a proposed work before approving a license”. The judge also added, “A ruling uprooting these common practices would limit creativity and stifle innovation within the music industry.”

Nicki Minaj’s attorneys mentioned that “Such free-flowing creativity is important to all recording artists, but particularly in hip hop”, the attorney also added, “With that category of music, a recording artist typically goes into the studio and experiments with dozens of different ‘beats’ or snippets of melodies, before hitting upon a pleasing combination.”

The argument that they come out stated that artists need to be free so that they are able to create something that has an impact on the song even though it is based on existing material. They should not have to worry about any circumstances that they could be sued for such experimentation once they approach the rights-holder for a license.

Sources: Variety.

Adib Mohd

Recent Posts

Abang Minyak Hitam Jalanan Gets His Lorry

While the rest of the world is distracted by courtroom drama and billionaire feuds, a… Read More

4 days ago

Horizon Watches Unveils The Nemolithic — Where Time is Carved in Stone

Independent watchmaker Horizon Watches proudly announced the launch of the Horizon Nemolithic, a bold evolution… Read More

4 days ago

Cooler Destinations, Hotter Demand: Getaways to Escape the Heat and How to Plan Them More Smartly

Earth is heating up: Experts project that 2026 is likely to be among the four… Read More

4 days ago

The Financial Jump Scare: Why Malaysian Brides are Ditching 1,000-Pax Weddings in 2026

If your timeline looks like mine, it’s currently a battlefield of wedding spreadsheets and hidden… Read More

4 days ago

IKEA’s 30th Anniversary: 30% Off Meatballs & 90s Vibes

If you haven't seen the blue-and-yellow flood on your social media feed, you’re missing out… Read More

5 days ago

Stop Spending RM1,000 ChatGPT is the New Viral Color Analyst

In the era of "main character energy," we all want to look our best, but… Read More

5 days ago

This website uses cookies.